Chapter 9, Appendixes, and Exhibits
Addiction is not a fixed and rigid event. Like psychiatric disorders,
addiction is a dynamic process, with fluctuations in severity, rate
of progression, and symptom manifestation and with differences in the
speed of onset. Both disorders are greatly influenced by several factors,
including genetic susceptibility, environment, and pharmacologic influences.
Certain people have a high risk for these disorders (genetic risk);
some situations can evoke or help to sustain these disorders (environmental
risk); and some drugs are more likely than others to cause psychiatric
or AOD use disorder problems (pharmacologic risk).
Pharmacologic effects can be therapeutic or detrimental. Medication
often produces both effects. Therapeutic pharmacologic effects include
the indicated purposes and desired outcomes of taking prescribed medications,
such as a decrease in the frequency and severity of episodes of depression
produced by antidepressants.
Detrimental pharmacologic effects include unwanted side effects, such
as dry mouth or constipation resulting from antidepressant use. Side
effects perceived as noxious by patients may decrease their compliance
with taking the medications as directed.
Some detrimental pharmacologic effects relate to abuse and addiction
potential.For example, some medications may be stimulating, sedating,
or euphorigenic and may promote physical dependence and tolerance. These
effects can promote the use of medication for longer periods and at
higher doses than prescribed.
Thus, prescribing medication involves striking a balance between therapeutic
and detrimental phar-macologic effects. For instance, therapeutic antianxiety
effects of the benzodiazepines are balanced against detrimental pharmacologic
effects of sedation and physical dependency. Similarly, the desired
therapeutic effect of abstinence from alcohol is balanced by the possibility
of damage to the liver from prescribed disulfiram (Antabuse).
Side effects of prescription medications vary greatly and include detrimental
pharmacologic effects that may promote abuse or addiction. With regard
to patients with dual disorders, special attention should be given to
detrimental effects, in terms of 1) medication compliance, 2) abuse
and addiction potential, 3) AOD use disorder relapse, and 4) psychiatric
disorder relapse (Ries, 1993a).
Not all psychiatric medications are psychoactive. The term psychoactive
describes the ability of certain medications, drugs, and other
substances to cause acute psychomotor effects and a relatively rapid
change in mood or thought. Changes in mood include stimulation, sedation,
and euphoria. Thought changes can include a disordering of thought such
as delusions, hallucinations, and illusions. Behavioral changes can
include an acceleration or retardation of motor activity. All drugs
of abuse are by definition psychoactive.
In contrast, certain nonpsychoactive medications such as lithium (Eskalith)
can, over time, normalize the abnormal mood and behavior of patients
with bipolar disorder. Because these effects take several days or weeks
to occur, and do not involve acute mood alteration, it is not accurate
to describe these drugs as psychoactive, euphorigenic, or mood altering.
Rather, they might be described as mood regulators.Similarly,
some drugs, such as antipsychotic medications, cause normalization of
thinking processes but do not cause acute mood alteration or euphoria.
However, some antidepressant and antipsychotic medications have pharmacologic
side effects such as mild sedation or mild stimulation. Indeed, the
side effects of these medications can be used clinically. Physicians
can use a mildly sedating antidepressant medication for patients with
depression and insomnia, or a mildly stimulating antipsychotic medication
for patients with psychosis and hypersomnia or lethargy (Davis and Goldman,
1992). While the side effects ofthese drugs include a mild effect on
mood, they are not euphorigenic. Nevertheless, case reports of misuse
of nonpsychoactive medications have been noted, and use should be monitored
carefully in patients with dual disorders.
While psychoactive drugs are generally considered to have high risk
for abuse and addiction, mood- regulating drugs are not. A few other
medications exert a mild psychoactive effect without having addiction
potential. For example, the older antihistamines such as doxylamine
(Unisom) exert mild sedative effects, but not euphoric effects.
Some drugs promote reinforcement, or the increased likelihood
of repeated use. Reinforcement can occur by either the removal of negative
symptoms or conditions or the amplification of positive symptoms or
states. For example, self-medication that delays or prevents an unpleasant
event (such as withdrawal) from occurring becomes reinforcing. Thus,
using a benzodiazepine to avoid alcohol withdrawal can increase the
likelihood of continued use.Positive reinforcement involves strengthening
the possibility that a certain behavior will be repeated through reward
and satisfaction, as with drug-induced euphoria or drug-induced feelings
of well-being. A classic example is the pleasure derived from moderate
to high doses of opiates or stimulants.Drugs that are immediately reinforcing
are more likely to lead to psychiatric or AOD use problems.
Long-term or chronic use of certain medications can cause tolerance
to the subjective and therapeutic effects and prompt dosage increases
to recreate the desired effects. In addition, many drugs cause a well-defined
withdrawal phenomenon after the cessation of chronic use. Patients'
attempts to avoid withdrawal syndromes often lead them to additional
drug use.Thus, drugs that promote tolerance and withdrawal generally
have higher risks for abuse and addiction.
As can be seen, there are pharmacologic as well as hereditary and environmental
factors that influence the development of AOD use problems. All of these
factors should be considered prior to prescribing medication, especially
when the patient is at high risk for developing an AOD use disorder.
High-risk patients include people with both psychiatric and AOD use
disorders, as well as patients with a psychiatric disorder and a family
history of AOD use disorders.
One aspect of this issue relates to the pharmacologic profile of certain
medications that are used in the treatment of specific psychiatric disorders.
For instance, many medications used to treat symptoms of depression
and psychosis are not psychoactive or euphorigenic. However, many of
the medications used to treat symptoms of anxiety, such as the benzodiazepines,
are psychoactive, reinforcing, have potential for tolerance and withdrawal,
and have an abuse potential, especially among people who are at high
risk for AOD use disorders. Other antianxiety medications, such as buspirone
(BuSpar), are not psychoactive or reinforcing and have low abuse potential,
even among people at high risk.
Thus, decisions about whether and when to prescribe medication to a
high-risk patient should include a risk-benefit analysis that considers
the risk of medication abuse, the risk of undertreating a psychiatric
problem, the type and severity of the psychiatric problem, the relationship
between the psychiatric disorder and the AOD use disorder for the individual
patient, and the therapeutic benefits of resolving the psychiatric and
AOD problems.
For example, the early and aggressive medication of high-risk patients
who have severe presentations of psychotic depression, mania, and schizophrenia
isoften necessary to prevent further psychiatric deterioration and possible
death.For these patients, rapid and aggressive medication can shorten
the length of the psychiatric episodes. In contrast, prescribing benzodiazepines
to high-risk patients with similarly severe anxiety involves a substantial
risk of promoting or exacerbating an AOD use disorder. For these high-risk
patients, the use of psychoactive medication should not be the first
line of treatment.
Rather, for some high-risk patients, treatment efforts should involve
a stepwise treatment model that begins with conservative approaches
and progressively becomes more aggressive if the treatment goals are
not met (Landry et al., 1991a). For example, the stepwise treatment
model for treating high-risk patients with anxiety disorders may involve
three progressive levels of treatment: 1) nonpharmacologic approaches
when possible; 2) nonpsychoactive medication when nonpharmacologic approaches
are insufficient; and 3) psychoactive medications when other treatment
approaches provide limited or no relief (Landry et al., 1991).
Pharmacologic Risk Factors
A medication may have:
- Psychoactive potential (causes acute psychomotor effects)
- Reinforcement potential (decreases negative symptoms and increases
positive symptoms)
- Tolerance and withdrawal potential (a higher does is needed to gain
the effect or to avoid ill effects).
A Stepwise Management Approach For Mild and Moderate Mental Disorders
*
- Step One:
Try nonpharmacologic approaches
- Step Two:
Add nonpsychoactive medications if Step One is unsuccessful
- Step Three:
Add psychoactive medications if Steps One and Two are unsuccessful.
* For severe conditions, such as psychotic depression, mania, and schizophrenic
disorders, rapid and aggressive use of medications is needed to prevent
danger to self or others and further psychiatric deterioration.
Depending upon the psychiatric disorders and personal variables, numerous
nonpharmacologic approaches can help patients manage all or some aspects
of their psychiatric disorders (Weiss and Billings, 1988). Examples
include psychotherapy, cognitive therapy, behavioral therapy, relaxation
skills, meditation, biofeedback, acupuncture, hypnotherapy, self-help
groups, support groups, exercise, and education.
Some medications are not psychoactive and do not cause acute psychomotor
effects or euphoria. Some medications do not cause psychoactive or psychomotor
effects at therapeutic doses but may exert limited psychoactive effects
at high doses (often noteuphoria, but sometimes dysphoria).
For practical purposes, all of these medications can be described as
nonpsychoactive, since the psychoactive effect is not prominent.Medications
used in psychiatry that are not euphorigenic or significantly psychoactive
include but are not limited to the azapirones (for example, buspirone),
the amino acids, beta-blockers, antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors,
antipsychotics, lithium, antihistamines, anticonvulsants, and anticholinergic
medications.
Some medications can cause significant and acute alterations in psychomotor,
emotional, and mental activity at therapeutic doses. At higher doses,
and for some patients, some of these medications can also cause euphoric
reactions. Medications that are potentially psychoactive include opioids,
stimulants, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and other sedative-hypnotics.
One of the emphases of stepwise treatment is to encourage nondrug treatment
strategies for each emerging symptom before medications are prescribed.
Nondrug treatment strategies alone are inappropriate for acute and severe
symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorders, but nondrug strategies
do have their place in the treatment of virtually any psychiatric problem,
and may provide partial or total relief of some symptoms related to
severe psychiatric disorders. For example, relaxation therapy can minimize
or eliminate somatic symptoms of anxiety that may accompany an agitated
depression.
A second emphasis of stepwise treatment is to encourage the use of
medications that have a low abuse potential. This conservative approach
must be balanced against other therapeutic and safety considerations
in acute and severe conditions, such aspsychosis or mania. On the other
hand, a conservative approach is not the same as undermedication of
psychiatric problems. Undermedication often leads to psychiatric deterioration
and may promote AOD relapse. There should be a balance between effective
treatment and safety.
A third emphasis of stepwise treatment is to encourage the idea that
different treatment approaches should be viewed as complementary, not
competitive. For example, if psychotherapy or group therapy does not
provide complete relief from a situational depression (such as prolonged
grief), then antidepressants should be considered as an adjunct to the
psychotherapy, but not as a substitute for psychotherapy.
In practice, treatment providers often use a combination of drug and
nondrug strategies. This practice includes medication to treat the acute
manifestations of the disorder while the individual learns long-term
management strategies. For example, an individual may be prescribed
nonpsychoactive buspirone to reduce anxiety symptoms while learning
stress reduction techniques and attending group therapy.
These guidelines are broad, general, and more applicable to chronic
than to acute psychiatric problems. Also, these guidelines have limited
application to very severe psychiatric problems.
Several antihistamines are approved for sale as over-the-counter hypnotics,
including diphenhydramine (Nytol, Benadryl), doxylamine (Unisom), and
pyrilamine (Quiet World). The efficacy of these drugs is not uniform,
and tolerance to the anxiolytic and hypnotic effects is rapid, limiting
their utility for episodic use. Antihistamines are frequently prescribed
for mild anxiety and insomnia, particularly for patients in general
hospitals, patients with physical illness (Salzman, 1989), and elderly
patients.
In general, the early antihistamines exert very mild anxiolytic and
hypnotic effects, but lack euphoric properties and do not promote physical
dependence (Meltzer, 1990). While lacking significant abuse potential
themselves, antihistamines may cause problems for some patients by reinforcing
the idea of self-medication of insomnia and anxiety. Taken in high doses,
antihistamines may cause acute delirium,alter mood (often causing dysphoria),
or cause morning-after depression. Under close medical supervision,
the conservative use of antihistamines can be valuable in treating brief
episodes of insomnia during an otherwise drug-free recovery process.
Patients in recovery should be discouraged from purchasing and using
over-the-counter antihistamines.
The antidepressants include several types of medication, such as tricyclics,
monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), and other, newer, antidepressants
such as trazodone (Desyrel), bupropion (Wellbutrin), sertraline (Zoloft),
and fluoxetine (Prozac). Antidepressants are effective for the treatment
of depression, and several are valuable for the treatment of anxiety
disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder, phobias, and panic
disorder.
The antidepressants are not euphorigenic, and do not cause acute mood
alterations. Rather, they are mood regulators and diminish the severity
and frequency of depressive episodes; they also have anti-panic capabilities
unrelated to sedation.
While the general effects of most of the older tricyclic antidepressants
are similar, they differ considerably with regard to side effects. For
example, some antidepressants such as doxepin (Sinequan) exert a mild
sedating effect, while others such as protriptyline (Vivactil) exert
a mild stimulating effect. These side effects can be clinically useful.
For example, clinicians might give antidepressants with slight sedating
effects to depressed patients with insomnia or give those with mild
stimulating effects to depressed patients who experience low energy
and hypersomnia (Davis and Goldman, 1992).
Other side effects of tricyclic antidepressants are common. Anticholinergic
effects such as dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, urinary hesitancy,
and toxic-confusional states are common anticholinergic effects. Adrenergic
activation symptoms may include tremor, excitement, palpitation, orthostatic
hypotension, and weight gain. These noxious side effects are frequently
the cause of requests to switch from one medication type to another.
Also, side effects often prompt discontinuation of medication, which
may provoke reemergence of the psychopathology. Tricyclics unfortunately
are quite toxic when combined with AODs. Therefore use of tricyclic
antidepressants in early recovery should be carefully monitored.
More expensive, but much less toxic when used with AODs, are the newer
serotonin reuptake inhibitors including fluoxetine, paroxitine (Paxil),
and sertraline. These agents also have anticompulsive effects, and their
side effects tend to be slight to moderate stimulation rather than sedation.
They are much safer to use in early recovery.
Overall, the use of antidepressants is consistent with a psychoactive-drug-free
philosophy, does not compromise recovery from addiction, and enhances
recovery from depressive and panic disorders. However, patient information
must include clear explanations of the reasons for prescribing, the
expected results, and the risks of adverse effects, including overdose.
The risk-benefit analysis must include the risk of lethal overdose with
tricyclic antidepressants, especially for depressed patients (Reid,
1989).
The beta-blockers such as propranolol (Inderal) are well-recognized
medications for the treatment of hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias,
and angina pectoris.They also have clinical efficacy as an adjunct in
the treatment of anxiety (Lader, 1988). The b-blockers may reduce or
eliminate the adrenergic discharge associated with panic attacks, thus
blocking the somatic components of some anxiety states, especially when
somatic symptoms predominate (Trevor and Way, 1989). b-blockers diminish
the tremor and restlessness related to lithium or antipsychotics in
some patients.
The Beta-blockers are not psychoactive, euphorigenic, or mood altering.
Since tolerance to the anti-panic effects of b-blockers develops rapidly,
they cannot be used for extended periods of time for this purpose. Rather,
they are often used prophylactically for anticipated panic-producing
situations, or for episodes of anxiety that may last a few days. The
b-blockers are also used to decrease acute and subacute anxiety symptoms
during detoxification from sedative-hypnotics such as the benzodiazepines.Overall,
the use of b-blockers is consistent with a psychoactive-drug-free philosophy,
does not compromise recovery from addiction, and can be an important
adjunct to anxiety management.
While all of the benzodiazepines have anxiolytic characteristics, they
differ in their effectiveness in treating generalized anxiety disorder,
mixed anxiety and depression, panic attacks, phobic-avoidancebehaviors,
and insomnia. In general, the benzodiazepines promote sedation, central
nervous system depression, and muscle relaxation, and thus are effective
for anxiety reduction and, at higher doses, for short-term management
of insomnia.
The benzodiazepines are psychoactive, mood altering, and reinforcing.
Chronic use and subsequent cessation can cause withdrawal symptoms.
Studies have shown that the benzodiazepines are not uniformly euphorigenic.
Also, patients with a family and personal history of AOD abuse and addiction
are more likely to experience euphoria with the benzodiazepines (Ciraulo
et al., 1988, 1989).
Benzodiazepines are the most commonly used agents to moderate alcohol
withdrawal and prevent dangerous withdrawal conditions such as delirium
tremens and seizures. They are also widely used during detoxification
from sedative-hypnotics. The benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed
for use alone and in combination with antipsychotics during the treatment
of acute psychotic symptoms caused by mania, schizophrenia, and drugs
of abuse such as cocaine. Such treatment should be limited to the acute
episode for most patients with dual disorders, so that one problem (psychosis)
is not replaced by another problem (physical dependence or addiction).
The benzodiazepines are not usually recommended for long-term use in
patients with dual disorders unless all nonpsychoactive approaches have
failed. That is, if all other less potentially adverse medications have
proven inadequate and the benzodiazepines are indicated, then careful
dispensing, regulation of dose, and scrupulous monitoring are required.
Overall, the use of benzodiazepines after the medical management of
withdrawal is not consistent with a psychoactive-drug-free philosophy
and may compromise recovery from addiction (Zweben and Smith, 1989).
However, they can be used in the management of acute and severe withdrawal,
panic, and psychosis with special guidelines in nonroutine situations.
Buspirone is the most well known of a new group of drugs (the azapirones)
that selectively diminish multiple symptoms of anxiety without the acute
mood alteration, sedation, or associated somatic side effects seen in
the sedative-hypnotic anxiolytics.Buspirone is useful for generalized
anxiety disorder, chronic anxiety symptoms, anxiety with depressive
features, and anxiety among elderly patients. Buspirone isgenerally
equivalent to the benzodiazepines with regard to anxiety management
(Petracca et al., 1990; Strand et al., 1990). However, it takes several
weeks for the maximal therapeutic effect of buspirone to occur.
Buspirone is not psychoactive, mood altering, or euphorigenic (Balster,
1990). In particular, buspirone does not cause the mood alteration,
central nervous system depression, sedation, and muscle relaxation associated
with the benzodiazepines. However, many people with experience taking
benzodiazepines may associate these mood alterations with relief of
anxiety. As a result, patients who have experience with the benzodiazepines
may misinterpret the absence of these side effects as evidence that
the medication is ineffective. Educating patients about the distinction
between anxiety reduction and sedation and about treatment expectations
can avoid these misinterpretations.
Overall, the use of buspirone is consistent with a psychoactive-drug-free
philosophy, does not compromise recovery from addiction, and enhances
recovery from anxiety disorders.
Used in the form of a patch (Catapres Transdermal Therapeutic System
patches) or tablets (Catapres), clonidine is well recognized as a treatment
for symptoms of hypertension, including hypertensive symptoms that occur
during withdrawal from depressant drugs, especially the opioids. In
addition, clonidine appears to have anxiolytic and anti-panic properties
comparable to the antidepressant imipramine. Patients may become less
anxious but remain symptomatic. Some patients who have anxiety-depression
or panic-anxiety experience significant antianxiety effects from clonidine.
The anti-panic effect is the result of clonidine's ability to decrease
locus ceruleus firing and thus decrease adrenergic discharge. Thus,
clonidine may be useful for short-term use in the treatment of refractory
anxiety with panic (Domisse and Hayes, 1987; Uhde et al., 1989).
Clonidine is not psychoactive, euphorigenic, or mood altering. Clonidine
may have significant antianxiety effects when administered to patients
with anxiety-depression and panic-anxiety. However, tolerance to the
anti-panic effects of clonidine can develop within several weeks. Thus,
clonidine may be most useful forshort-term use in the treatment of refractory
panic disorder.
Overall, the use of clonidine is consistent with a psychoactive-drug-free
philosophy, does not compromise recovery from addiction, and may be
an adjunct in the treatment of anxiety symptoms.
The neuroleptic medications are most effective in suppressing the positive
symptoms of psychosis such as hallucinations, delusions, and incoherence.
In addition, they may help reduce disturbances of arousal, affect, psychomotor
activity, thought content, and social adjustment (Africa and Schwartz,
1992). These psychotic symptoms may accompany schizophrenia, brief reactive
psychosis, schizophreniform disorder, mania, depression, and organic
mental disorders induced by AODs and medical conditions (Ries, 1993a).
Although neuroleptic medications are equally effective in suppressing
psychotic symptoms, individuals may respond to one medication better
than another. The chief differences among the neuroleptics relate to
dosage, onset of effects, and (especially) side effects. Some side effects
may be clinically useful, such as nighttime sedation with chlorpromazine
or avoidance of appetite stimulation with molindone (Moban) (Africa
and Schwartz, 1992).
In general, low-potency neuroleptics, for example, chlorpromazine,
thioridazine (Mellaril), and clozapine (Clozaril), have significant
sedative and hypotensive properties. Tolerance to these properties may
develop within a few weeks. Also, low-potency neuroleptics are inherently
anticholinergic, so that the use of additional anticholinergic drugs
to prevent extrapyramidal symptoms may be unnecessary. The high-potency
neuroleptics such as fluphenazine (Prolixin) and haloperidol (Haldol)
cause more extrapyramidal side effects than the low-potency medications.
The extrapyramidal system is a network of nerve pathways that links
nerves in the surface of the cerebrum (the deep mass of the brain),
the basal ganglia deep within the brain, and parts of the brain stem.
The extrapyramidal system influences and modifies electrical impulses
that are sent from the brain to the skeletal muscles.
When this system is damaged or disturbed, execution of voluntary movements
and muscle tonecan be disrupted, and involuntary movements, such as
tremors, jerks, or writhing movements, can appear. These disturbances
are called extrapyramidal syndromes, which can be caused by all of the
neuroleptic medications except clozapine.
Extrapyramidal symptoms are unwanted, noxious, and uncomfortable. Compliance
with neuroleptic medications is worsened because of the onset of these
drug-induced symptoms. A class of medications called anticholinergic
agents can eliminate the muscle spasms in the neck, oral, facial, cheek,
and tongue regions. Several other types of medications may also be helpful,
including amantadine and beta-blockers.
Anticholinergic agents can also reduce the extrapyramidal movement
disorder called akathisia, which consists of purposeless movements,
usually of the lower extremities, often accompanied by the experience
of severe, uncomfortable restlessness. These medications include benztropine
(Cogentin), biperiden (Akineton), diphenhydramine (Benadryl), trihexyphenidyl
(Antitrem), and procyclidine (Kemadrin). Patient response should be
monitored because some anticholinergic medications may be mildly psychoactive
for some AOD patients.
Neuroleptic drugs are not euphorigenic and do not cause acute mood
or psychomotor alterations.However, side effects are common. Most of
the neuroleptics cause sedation as a side effect, although adaptation
to the sedative (but not the antipsychotic) effects develops within
days or weeks. The anticholinergic side effects of neuroleptic medications
can include dry mouth, constipation, and blurred vision. The neuroleptics
can also cause extrapyramidal symptoms. The adverse side effects of
neuroleptic medications are a frequent cause of medication compliance
problems. These adverse effects can also prompt patients to use AODs
to self-medicate noxious symptoms.
Because patients with psychotic symptoms often experience significant
biopsychosocial problems, the neuroleptics allow them to engage in problem-solving
and recovery-oriented interpersonal activities. Overall, the use of
neuroleptics is consistent with a psychoactive-drug-free philosophy,
does not compromise recovery from addiction, and enhances recovery from
psychotic disorders.
Lithium is the standard and first-line treatment formanic episodes,
even though 10-14 days may be required before full effect is achieved.
The initial symptoms managed by lithium include increased psychomotor
activity, pressured speech, and insomnia. Later, lithium diminishes
the symptoms of expansive mood, grandiosity, and intrusiveness. Lithium
also treats signs related to disorganization of the form of thought
such as flight of ideas and loosening of association.
Lithium does not cause acute mood alteration, and is not psychoactive
or mood altering.Rather, lithium is a mood regulator, and diminishes
symptoms of acute mania. The common adverse effects of lithium include
thirst, urinary frequency, tremor, and gastrointestinal distress. Lithium
allows patients who may have seriously disabling symptoms to engage
in problem-solving and recovery-oriented interpersonal activities. Overall,
the use of lithium is consistent with a psychoactive-drug-free philosophy,
does not compromise recovery from addiction, and enhances recovery from
bipolar disorders.
Anticonvulsants have a role in the management of bipolar disorders,
mania, schizoaffective disorder, and alcohol and benzodiazepine withdrawal.
In addition, these medications may be prescribed for "flashbacks" related
to drug use or post-traumatic stress disorder. These medications, such
as carbamazepine (Tegretol) and valproic acid, are not psychoactive.
The typically minor side effects of sedation and nausea may emerge as
treatment is initiated. Rarely, carbamazepine causes a decrease in white
blood cell count. Both medications are monitored according to blood
levels. For the treatment of bipolar disorder, the anticonvulsants are
most often used when lithium has failed. However, they are occasionally
used by highly skilled physicians as first-line treatment. These medications
are consistent with a psychoactive-drug-free philosophy, and may enhance
the abilities of those who need them to participate in the recovery
process.
There are certain risks associated with AOD use and withdrawal among
patients who are also being administered medications to treat psychiatric
disorders. Because of these risks, serious consideration should be given
to inpatient treatment for withdrawal.
- Alcohol and barbiturates can cause increased tolerance by increasing
the amount of liver enzymes responsible for their metabolism. These
same liver enzymes are also responsible for metabolizing many antidepressant,
anticonvulsant, and antipsychotic medications. Thus, serum levels
of medications will be decreased, possibly to subtherapeutic levels.
Without assessing for possible AOD use, some physicians may mistakenly
increase medication doses.
- Alcohol interferes with the thermoregulatory center of the brain,
as do antipsychotic drugs. Patients taking both medications may be
unable to adjust their body temperature in response to extremes in
the external environment.
- The interaction of stimulants in a person taking monoamine oxidase
inhibitor antidepressants can lead to a life-threatening hypertensive
crisis.
- Alcohol and cocaine enhance the respiratory depression effects of
opioids and some neuroleptics such as the phenothiazines. This effect
can increase vulnerability to overdose death.
- Marijuana has anticholinergic effects. In combination with the anticholinergic
medications such as Cogentin, marijuana use can lead to an anticholinergic
(atropine) psychosis.
- Patients who are vulnerable to hallucinations, such as schizophrenic
patients, are at high risk for having hallucinations during the withdrawal
from alcohol and other sedative-hypnotics.
- Antipsychotics and antidepressants lower the seizure threshold and
enhance seizure potential during withdrawal from sedative-hypnotics
and alcohol.
- Alcohol intoxication and withdrawal disturbs the fluid electrolyte
balance in the body, which can lead to lithium toxicity.
[Back Matter]
- Africa, B., and Schwartz, S.R.
- Schizophrenic disorders. In: Goldman, H.H., ed. Review of General
Psychiatry, Third Edition. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1992.
pp. 226-241.
- American Psychiatric Association.
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third
Edition, Revised. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association,
1987.
- American Psychiatric Association.
- DSM-IV Draft Criteria, 3/1/93. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric
Association, 1993.
- Anthenelli, R.M., and Schuckit, M.A.
- Affective and anxiety disorders and alcohol and drug dependence:
diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Addictive Diseases
12(3):73-87, 1993.
- Baker, F.
- Coordination of alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health services.
Technical Assistance Publication Series Number 4. Washington, D.C.:
Office for Treatment Improvement, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health
Administration, 1991.
- Balster, R.L.
- Abuse potential of buspirone and related drugs. Journal
of Clinical Psychopharmacology 10(3, Suppl.):31S-37S,
1990.
- Beck, A.T., and Ward, J.
- Beck Depression Inventory. In: Beck A.T., ed., Depression: Causes
and Treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.
- Bernadt, M.W., and Murray, R.M.
- Psychiatric disorder, drinking and alcoholism: what are the
links? British Journal of Psychiatry 148:393-400,
1986.
- Blume, S.B.
- Dual diagnosis: Psychoactive substance dependence and the personality
disorders. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 21(2):139-144,
1989.
- Brown, R.L.
- Identification and office management of alcohol and drug disorders.
In: Fleming, M.F., and Barry, K.L., eds. Addictive Disorders. St. Louis:
Mosby Yearbook, 1992.
- Brown, V.B., Ridgely, M.S., Pepper, B., Levine, I.R.,
and Ryglewicz, H.
- The dual crisis: Mental illness and substance abuse, present
and future directions. American Psychologist
44(3):565-569, 1989.
- Bryant, K.J., Rounsaville, B., Spitzer, R.L., and
Williams, J.B.
- Reliability of dual diagnosis, substance dependence and psychiatric
disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
180(4):251-257, 1992.
- Burns, D.D.
- The Feeling Good Handbook. New York: Penguin Books, 1989.
- Carmen, E., and Brady, S.M.
- AIDS risk and prevention for the chronic mentally ill. Hospital
and Community Psychiatry 41(6):652-657, 1990.
Castaneda, Casteneda, R., Galanter,
M., and Franco, H.
- Self-medication among addicts with primary psychiatric disorders.
Comprehensive Psychiatry 30(1):80-83,
1989.
- Castaneda, R., Galanter, M., Lifshutz, H., and Franco,
H.
- Effects of drugs of abuse on psychiatric symptoms among hospitalized
schizophrenics. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
17(3):313-320, 1991.
- Caton, C.L., Gralnick, A., Bender, S., and Simon,
R.
- Young chronic patients and substance abuse. Hospital
and Community Psychiatry 40(10):1037-1040, 1989.
- Ciraulo, D.A., Barnhill, J.G., Ciraulo, A.M., Greenblatt,
D.J., and Shader, R.I.
- Parental alcoholism as a risk factor in benzodiazepine abuse:
A pilot study. American Journal of Psychiatry
146:1333-1335, 1989.
- Ciraulo, D. A., Barnhill, J.G., Greenblatt, D.J.,
Shader, R.I., Ciraulo, A.M., Tarmey, M.F., Molloy, M.A., and Foti, M.E.
- Abuse liability and clinical pharmacokinetics of alprazolam
in alcoholic men. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
49:333-337, 1988.
- Clark, H.W., and Zweben, J.E.
- Legal vulnerabilities in the treatment of chemically dependent
dual diagnosis patients. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
21(2):251-257, 1989.
- Davis, G.C., and Goldman, B.
- Somatic therapies. In: Goldman, H.H., ed. Review of General
Psychiatry, Third Edition. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1992.
pp. 370-390.
- Dixon, L., Haas, G., Weiden, P., Sweeney, J., and
Frances, A.
- Acute effects of drug abuse in schizophrenic patients: clinical
observations and patients' self-reports. Schizophrenia Bulletin
16(1):69-79, 1990.
-
Domisse, Dommisse, C.S., and Hayes,
P.E.
- Current concepts in clinical therapeutics: anxiety disorders,
Part 2. Clinical Pharmacy 6:196-215,
1987.
- Drake, R.E., Osher, F.C., and Wallach, M.A.
- Homelessness and dual diagnosis. American Psychologist
46(11):1149-1158, 1991.
- Evans, K., and Sullivan, J.M.
- Dual Diagnosis: Counseling the Mentally Ill Substance Abuser.
New York: Guilford Press, 1990.
- Evans, K., and Sullivan, J.M.
- Step Study Counseling With the Dual Disordered Client. Center
City, Minnesota: Hazelden Educational Materials, 1990.
- Fischer, P.J., and Breakey, W.R.
- The epidemiology of alcohol, drug, and mental disorders among
homeless persons. American Psychologist 46(11):1115-1126,
1991.
- Gold, M.S.
- The Good News About Depression. New York: Villard Books, 1987.
- Gold, M.S.
- The Good News About Drugs and Alcohol. New York: Villard Books,
1990.
- Gold, M.S.
- The Good News About Panic, Anxiety, and Phobias. New York: Villard
Books, 1989.
- Goldman, M.S.
- Neuropsychological recovery in alcoholics: endogenous and exogenous
processes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
10(2):136-144, 1986.
- Gordon, S.M., Kennedy, B.P., and McPeake, J.D.
- Neuropsychologically impaired alcoholics: assessment, treatment
considerations, and rehabilitation. Journal of Substance
Abuse Treatment 5:99-104, 1988.
- Gorelick, D.A.
- Serotonin uptake blockers and the treatment of alcoholism. In:
Galanter, M., ed. Recent Developments in Alcoholism. New York: Plenum
Press, 1989. pp. 267-281.
- El-Guebaly, N.
- Substance abuse and mental disorders: the dual diagnoses concept.
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 35:261-267,
1990.
- Hasin, D.S., Endicott, J., and Keller, M.B.
- Alcohol problems in psychiatric patients: 5-year course. Comprehensive
Psychiatry 32(4):303-316, 1991.
- Hedlund, J.L., and Vieweg, M.S.
- The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST). Journal
of Operational Psychiatry 15:55-64, 1984.
- Hendrickson, E.L.
- Treating the dually diagnosed (mental disorder/substance use)
client. Tie Lines 4(4):1-6, 1988.
- Jensen, K.L.
- Family issues in treating the "dually diagnosed" client. Tie
Lines 7:6-8, 1990.
- Kofoed, L., Kania, J., Walsh, T., and Atkinson, R.M.
- Outpatient treatment of patients with substance abuse and coexisting
psychiatric disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry
143(7):867-872, 1986.
- Kofoed, L., and Keys, A.
- Using group therapy to persuade dual-diagnosis patients to seek
substance abuse treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry
39(11):1209-1211, 1988.
- Kranzler, H.R., and Liebowitz, N.R.
- Anxiety and depression in substance abuse: clinical implications.
Medical Clinics of North America 72(4):867-885,
1988.
- Lader, M.
- Beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists in neuropsychiatry: an update.
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 49:213-223,
1988.
- Landry, M.J., Smith, D.E., McDuff, D.R., and Baughman,
O.L., 3rd.
- Anxiety and substance use disorders: the treatment of high-risk
patients. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice
4:447-456, 1991.
- Landry, M.J., Smith, D.E., and Steinberg, J.R.
- Anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders: diagnosis,
treatment, and prescribing practices. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
23(4):397-416, 1991a.
- Lehman, A.F., Myers, C.P., and Corty, E.
- Assessment and classification of patients with psychiatric and
substance abuse syndromes. Hospital and Community Psychiatry
40(10):1019-1030, 1989.
- Mayfield, D., McLeod, G., and Hall, P.
- The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening
instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry 131(10):1121-1123,
1974.
- McLellan, A.T.
- Predicting response to alcohol and drug abuse treatments: the
role of psychiatric severity. Archives of General Psychiatry
40:620-625, 1983.
- McLellan, A.T., Luborsky, L., Woody, G.E., and O'Brien,
C.P.
- An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse
patients: the Addiction Severity Index 168:26-33,
1980.
- Meek, P.S., Clark, H.W., and Solana, V.L.
- Neurocognitive impairment: the unrecognized component of dual
diagnosis in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Psychoactive
Drugs 21(2):153-160, 1989.
- Meltzer, E.O.
- Performance effects of antihistamines. Journal of
Allergy and Clinical Immunology 86(4, Part 2):613-619,
1990.
- Meyer, R.E.
- How to understand the relationship between psychopathology and
addictive disorders: another example of the chicken and the egg. In:
Meyer, R.E., ed. Psychopathology and Addictive Disorders. New York:
Guilford Press, 1986.
- Meyer, R.E. Prospects for a rational pharmacotherapy
of alcoholism.
- Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 50(11):403-412, 1989.
- MICA Advisory Committee, State of New Jersey. Glossary
of terms common in MICA treatment.
- Trenton, New Jersey: State of New Jersey, 1992.
- Miller, N.S., and Ries, R.K.
- Drug and alcohol dependence and psychiatric populations: the
need for diagnosis, intervention, and training. Comprehensive
Psychiatry 32(3):268-276, 1991.
- Minkoff, K.
- An integrated treatment model for dual diagnosis of psychosis
and addiction. Hospital and Community Psychiatry
40(10):1031-1036, 1989.
- Minkoff, K., and Drake, R.E., eds.
- Dual Diagnosis of Major Mental Illness and Substance Disorder.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1991.
- Mooney, A.J., Eisenberg, A, and Eisenberg, H.
- The Recovery Book. New York: Workman Publishers, 1992.
- Morris, S.K., and Schinke, S.P.
- Treatment needs and services for mothers with a dual diagnosis:
substance abuse and mental illness. In: Chaneles, S., and Pallone, N.J.,
eds. Clinical Treatment of the Criminal Offender in Outpatient Mental
Health Settings: New and Emerging Perspectives. New York: Haworth Press,
1990. pp. 65-84.
- Nace, E.P., Davis, C.W., and Gaspari, J.P.
- Axis II comorbidity in substance abusers. American
Journal of Psychiatry 148(1):118-120, 1991.
- Nace, E.P., Saxon, J.J., and Shore, N.
- Borderline personality disorder and alcoholism treatment: a
one-year follow-up study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol
47(3):196-200, 1986.
- Osher, F.C., and Kofoed, L.L.
- Treatment of patients with psychiatric and psychoactive substance
use disorders. Hospital and Community Psychiatry
40(10):1025-1030, 1989.
- Padgett, D., Struening, E.L., and Andrews, H.
- Factors affecting the use of medical, mental health, alcohol,
and drug treatment services by homeless adults. Medical Care
28(9):805-821, 1990.
- Penick, E.C., Powell, B.J., Liskow, B.I., Jackson,
J.O., and Nickel, E.J.
- The stability of coexisting psychiatric syndromes in alcoholic
men after one year. Journal of Studies on Alcohol
49:395-405, 1988.
- Pepper, B., and Ryglewicz, H.
- The young adult chronic patient and substance abuse. Tie
Lines 1(2):1-5, 1984.
- Pepper, B., and Ryglewicz, H.
- Dual-disorder treatment. Maine Dual Disorders Monographs, Volume
3. Maine Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, 1989.
- Petracca, A., Nisita, C., McNair, D., Melis, G.,
Guerani, G., and Cassano, G.B.
- Treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: preliminary clinical
experience with buspirone. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
51(9, Suppl.):31-39, 1990.
- Quinnet, P.
- When Self-Help Fails. New York: Crossroads, 1991.
- Regier, D.A., Boyd, J.H., Burke, J.D., Rae, D. S.,
Myers, J.K., Kramer, M., Robins, L.N., George, L.K., Karno, M., and
Locke, B.Z.
- One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the United States:
based on five Epidemiologic Catchment Area sites. Archives
of General Psychiatry 45:977-986, 1988.
- Regier, D.A., Farmer, M.E., Rae, D.S., Locke, B.Z.,
Keith, S.J., Judd, L.L., and Goodwin, F.K.
- Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug
abuse: results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study. Journal
of the American Medical Association 264(19):2511-2518,
1990.
- Regier, D.A., Narrow, W.E., and Rae, D.S.
- The epidemiology of anxiety disorders: the Epidemiologic Catchment
Area (ECA) experience. Journal of Psychiatric Research 24(Suppl. 2):3-14,
1990a.
- Reid, W.H.
- The Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders. New York: Brunner/Mazel,
1989.
- Reus, V.I.
- Mood disorders. In: Goldman, H.H., ed. Review of General Psychiatry,
Third Edition. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange, 1992. pp. 226-241.
- Rickels, K., Weisman, K., Norstad, N., Singer, M.,
Stoltz, D., Brown, A., and Danton, J.
- Buspirone and diazepam in anxiety: a controlled study.
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 43(12, Sec. 20):81-86,
1982.
- Ries, R.
- Clinical treatment matching models for dually diagnosed patients.
Psychiatric Clinics of North America 16(1):167-175,
1993.
- Ries, R.K.
- The dually diagnosed patient with psychotic symptoms.
Journal of Addictive Diseases 12(3):103-122, 1993a.
- Ries, R.K., and Ellingson, T.
- A pilot assessment at one month of 17 dual diagnosis patients.
Hospital and Community Psychiatry 41(11):1230-1233,
1990.
- Robins, E., Helzer, J.E., and Przybeck, T.R.
- Alcohol disorders in the community: a report from the Epidemiologic
Catchment Area study. In: Rose, R., and Barret J., eds. Alcoholism:
Origins and Outcome. New York: Raven Press, 1988. pp. 15-28.
- Rosenheck, R., Massari, L., Astrachan, B., and Suchinsky,
R.
- Mentally ill chemical abusers discharged from VA inpatient treatment:
1976-1988. Psychiatric Quarterly 61(4):237-249,
1990.
- Ross, H.E., Glaser, F.B., and Germanson, T.
- The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with alcohol
and other drug problems. Archives of General Psychiatry
45:1023-1031, 1988.
- Rounsaville, B.J., Anton, S.F., Carroll, K., Budde,
D., Prusoff, B.A., and Gawin, F.
- Psychiatric diagnoses of treatment-seeking cocaine abusers.
Archives of General Psychiatry 48:43-51,
1991.
- Ryglewicz, H.
- Psychoeducation: A wave of the present. Tie Lines
6(2):1-5, 1989.
- Salloum, I.M., Moss, H.B., and Daley, D.C.
- Substance abuse and schizophrenia: impediments to optimal care.
American Journal of Alcohol Abuse 17(3):321-336,
1991.
- Salzman, C.
- Treatment with antianxiety agents. In: Treatments of Psychiatric
Disorders. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1989.
pp. 2036-2052.
- Schorske, B., and Bedard, K.
- One State's role in building a continuum of care for severe
mental illness and chemical dependency. Community Support
Network News 6(2):10, 1989.
- Schuckit, M.A.
- Genetic and clinical implications of alcoholism and affective
disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 143(2):
140-147, 1986.
- Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B.W., Gibbon, M., and
First, M. B.
- Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Washington, D.C.:
American Psychiatric Press, 1990.
- Strand, M., Hetta, J., Rosen, A., Sorensen, S., Malmstrom,
R., Fabian, C., Marits, K., Vetterskog, K., Liljestrand, A.-G., and
Hegen, C.
- A double-blind, controlled trial in primary care patients with
generalized anxiety: a comparison between buspirone and oxazepam.
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 51(9, Suppl.):40-45,
1990.
- Stoffelmayr, B.E., Benishek, L.A., Humphreys, K.,
Lee, J.A., and Mavis, B.E.
- Substance abuse prognosis with an additional psychiatric diagnosis:
understanding the relationship. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
21(2):145-152, 1989.
- Teague, G., Mercer-McFadden, C., and Drake, R.E.
- Dual diagnosis and continuity of care: New Hampshire's integrated
initiatives for dual diagnosis patients. Tie Lines
6(1):1-3, 1989.
- Thacker, W., and Tremaine, L.
- Systems issues in serving the mentally ill substance abuser:
Virginia's experience. Hospital and Community Psychiatry
40(10):1046-1049, 1989.
- Torrey, E.F.
- Surviving Schizophrenia: A Family Manual. New York: Harper &
Row, 1983.
- Trevor, A.J., and Way, W.L.
- Drugs used for anxiety states and sleep problems. In: Goldman,
H.H., ed. Review of General Psychiatry, Second Edition. Norwalk, Connecticut:
Appleton & Lange, 1989.
- Turner, W.M., and Tsuang, M.T.
- Impact of substance abuse on the course and outcome of schizophrenia.
Schizophrenia Bulletin 16(1):87-95,
1990.
- Uhde, T.W., Stein, M.B., Vittone, B.J., Siever, L.J.,
Boulenger, J.P., Klein, E., and Mellman, T. A.
- Behavioral and physiologic effects of short-term and long-term
administration of clonidine in panic disorders. Archives
of General Psychiatry 46(2):170-177, 1989.
- Wallen, M., and Weiner, H.
- The dually diagnosed patient in an inpatient chemical dependency
treatment program. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly
5(1/2):197-218, 1988.
- Weiss, D.S., and Billings, J.H.
- Behavioral medicine techniques. In: Goldman, H.H., ed. Review
of General Psychiatry, Second Edition. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton
& Lange, 1989. pp. 574-579.
- Weiss, R.D., M.L. Griffin, and Mirin, S.M.
- Drug abuse as self-medication for depression: an empirical study.
American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 18:121-129,
1992.
- Weissman, M.M.
- The epidemiology of anxiety disorders: rates, risks and familial
patterns. Journal of Psychiatric Research 22(Suppl.
1):99-114, 1988.
- Winter, A.S.
- When Self-Help Isn't Enough. Washington, D.C.: Psychiatric Institutes
of America Press, 1990.
- Wolfe, H.L., and Sorensen, J.L.
- Dual diagnosis patients in the urban psychiatric emergency room.
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 21(2):169-175,
1989.
- Yeary, J.R., and Heck, C.L.
- Dual diagnosis: eating disorders and psychoactive substance
dependence. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 21(2):
239-249, 1989.
- Zweben, J.E.
- Issues in the treatment of the dual-diagnosis patient. In: Wallace,
B., ed. The Chemically Dependent: Phases of Treatment and Recovery.
New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1992.
- Zweben, J.E.
- Counseling issues in methadone maintenance treatment. Journal
of Psychoactive Drugs 23(2):177-190, 1991.
- Zweben, J.E., and Smith, D.E.
- Considerations in using psychotropic medication with dual diagnosis
patients in recovery. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
21(2): 221-226, 1989.
To provide readers with illustrative data on the costs of running programs
for patients with dual disorders, the consensus panel Chair obtained data
on actual costs during fiscal year 1991-1992 from three programs in urban
areas. One program, on the West Coast, provided day and evening intensive
outpatient services. The second, in the Northeast, provided intensive
outpatient services during the day. In the third program, in the Northwest,
daytime intensive outpatient services,partial hospitalization, and intensive
case management were provided.
Included in the tables below are descriptive data for each program, including
institutional status (for example, private for-profit or public), payer
mix (for example, Medicaid or self-pay patients), number of clients served
(at 100 percent capacity), salary ranges of various levels of staff, and
other expenses (for example, facility costs). Total expenses and total
revenues for each program are listedat the end.
TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DUAL DISORDERS SAMPLE COST DATA
|
Program 1 |
Program 2 |
Program 3 |
| PROGRAM TYPE |
| Evening Intensive Outpatient |
X |
| Day Intensive Outpatient |
X |
X |
X |
| Partial Hospitalization |
|
|
X |
| Other |
|
|
Day treatment and intensive case management |
| REGION |
West Coast |
Northeast |
Northwest |
| LOCALE |
Urban |
Urban |
Urban |
| INSTITUTIONAL STATUS |
| Private for-profit |
X |
|
|
| Private nonprofit |
| Public |
|
X |
X |
| Other |
| PAYER MIX (BY PERCENT) |
| Insurance/Managed Care |
X |
| Medicaid |
|
66% |
30% |
| Medicare |
X |
|
25% |
| Self-pay |
X |
4% |
| HMO contract |
X |
| State grant/purchase of care |
|
30% |
45% |
|
Program 1 |
Program 2 |
Program 3 |
| NUMBER OF PATIENTS SERVED (AT 100 PERCENT
CAPACITY) |
| Daily |
50+ |
45 |
100 |
| Weekly |
320 |
225 |
300 |
| SALARY RANGES |
| Administrators/managers |
$60,000 to 70,000 |
$38,000 to 50,000 |
$35,000 to 60,000 |
| Physicians |
$70/Hour to 100/Hour |
$85,00 |
$70,000 to 90,000 |
| Social workers |
$30,000 to 50,00 |
$30,000 |
$26,000 to 35,000 |
| Psychologists |
$50,000 to 60,000 |
n/a |
$50,000 to 70,000 |
| Support staff |
$18,000 to 27,000 |
$20,000 to 29,000 |
$22,000 to 28,000 |
| Other |
Addiction counselors, $23,000 to 35,000 |
Nurses, counselors and recreational therapists,
$25,000 to 38,000 |
Addiction mental health specialists, $23,000
to 33,000 |
|
|
|
Nurses $32,000 to 48,000 |
|
Program 1 |
Program 2 |
Program 3 |
| OTHER EXPENSES (BY PERCENT) |
| Administrative overhead |
7.1% |
24% |
20% |
| Personnel (including fringe benefits) |
80.5% |
60% |
70% |
| Facility costs |
12.4% |
16% |
10% |
|
TOTAL EXPENSES FY 1991-1992 |
TOTAL REVENUES FY 1991-1992 |
| Program 1 |
$482,000 |
$489,000 |
| Program 2 |
$811,052 |
$561,052 |
| Program 3 |
$2,200,000 |
$1,980,000 |
- John J. Ambre, M.D., Ph.D.
- American Medical Association
- Robert Anderson
- Director
- Criminal Justice Service
- National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors
- Richard J. Bast
- Public Health Advisor
- Quality Assurance and Evaluation Branch
- Division of State Programs
- Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
- Sandra M. Clunies, M.S., N.C.A.D.C.
- President, Maryland Addiction Counselor Certification Board
- Dorynne Czechowicz, M.D.
- Associate Director
- Medical and Professional Affairs
- Division of Clinical Research
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- Walter L. Faggett, M.D.
- National Medical Association
- Rita Goodman, M.S., R.N.C.
- Nurse Consultant
- Division of Primary Care Services
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- John Gregrich
- Policy Analyst
- Office for National Drug Control Policy
- Executive Office for the President
- Claudia Hart
- American Psychiatric Association
- Ruth H. Carlsen Kahn, D.N.Sc.
- Special Projects Section
- Division of Medicine
- Bureau of Health Professions
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- Saul M. Levin, M.D.
- Director
- Office of Health Care Linkage
- Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
- Cherry Lowman, Ph.D.
- Health Scientist Administrator
- Treatment Research Branch
- Division of Clinical and Prevention Research
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
- Anna Marsh, Ph.D.
- Associate Director for Evaluation
- Office of Applied Studies
- Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
- Fred C. Osher, M.D.
- Deputy Director
- Office of Programs for the Homeless Mentally Ill
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Deborah Parham, Ph.D., R.N.
- Chief
- Special Initiatives
- Policy and Evaluation Branch
- Bureau of Primary Health Care
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- Kay Pearson, R.Ph., M.P.H.
- Senior Health Policy Analyst
- Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
- Public Health Service
- Bert Pepper, M.D.
- The Information Exchange
- New City, New York
- Richard K. Ries, M.D. (Chair)
- Director of Inpatient Psychiatry and Dual Disorder Programs
- Harborview Medical Center
- Seattle, Washington
- Harry Schnibbe
- Executive Director
- National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors
- Sarah Stanley, M.S., R.N., C.N.A, C.S.
- American Nurses Association
- Patricia M. Weisser
- National Association of Psychiatric Survivors
- Arthur I. Alterman, Ph.D.
- Scientific Director
- Center for Studies of Addiction
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Robert Anderson
- Director, Criminal Justice
- National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors
- Gloria J. Baciewicz, M.D.
- Director
- Alcoholism and Drug Dependency Program
- University of Rochester Medical Center
- Rochester, New York
- Stephen J. Bartels, M.D.
- Medical Director
- West Central Services, Inc.
- Research Associate
- N.H. Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center
- Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Richard J. Bast
- Public Health Advisor
- Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
- Joseph J. Bevilaqua, Ph.D.
- Director
- South Carolina Department of Mental Health
- Dolores M. Burant, M.D.
- Program Director and Medical Director
- University Outpatient Recovery Services
- Madison, Wisconsin
- Ricardo Castaneda, M.D.
- Director
- Inpatient Psychiatry at Bellevue Hospital
- New York Medical Center
- Nancy C. Carter
- Director
- Special Division for Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services
- South Carolina Department of Mental Health
- Maureen Connelly, Ph.D.
- Professor
- Department of Sociology and Social Work
- Frostburg State University
- Frostburg, Maryland
- Marcelino Cruces, L.I.C.S.W.
- Administrative Coordinator
- Andromeda Transcultural Mental Health Center
- Substance Abuse Treatment Division
- Washington, D.C.
- Dorynne Czechowicz, M.D.
- Associate Director for Medical and Professional Affairs
- Division of Clinical Research
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- Robert E. Drake, M.D., Ph.D.
- Professor/Director
- N.H.-Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center
- Dartmouth Medical School
- Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Mary Katherine Evans, C.A.D.C., N.C.A.C. II
- Treatment Coordinator
- Evans and Sullivan
- Beaverton, Oregon
- Walter L. Faggett, M.D.
- Pediatrics/Health Care Consultant
- Capitol Area Health Services
- National Medical Association
- Denis Ferguson, M.A., C.S.A.D.C.
- Program Manager
- Substance Abuse Services
- DuPage County Health Department
- Wheaton, Illinois
- James Fine, M.D.
- Director
- Addictive Disease Hospital at Kings County Hospital Center
- Clinical Associate Professor
- Department of Psychiatry
- State University of New York
- Health Service Center at Brooklyn
- Brooklyn, New York
- Agnes Furey, L.P.N., C.A.P.
- Primary Care Coordinator
- Florida Drug and Alcohol Abuse Program
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Services
- Tallahassee, Florida
- Harry W. Haverkos, M.D.
- Acting Director
- Division of Clinical Research
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- Elizabeth A. Irvin, M.S.W.
- Director of Service Integration
- Department of Mental Health
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- Edward K. Katz, M.D., M.P.H.
- Mind Science
- Consultation for Problems in Thinking and Feeling
- Stow, Ohio
- Ruth H. Carlsen Kahn, D.N.Sc., R.N.
- Special Projects Section
- Division of Medicine
- Bureau of Health Professions
- Health Resources and Services Administration
- George Kolodner, M.D.
- Kolmac Clinic
- Silver Spring, Maryland
- Susan Krupnick, R.N., M.S.N., C.A.R.N., C.S.
- Psychiatric Consultation Liaison Nurse
- Department of Psychiatric Nursing
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
- Fox Chase Manor, Pennsylvania
- Robert M. Lichtman, Ph.D., C.A.C.
- Associate Psychologist/Program Coordinator
- Richmond Hill Outpatient Division
- Creedmoor Psychiatric Center
- Richmond Hill, New York
- Herbert J. McBride
- President and Medical Director
- Re-Enter, Inc.
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Catherine Devaney McKay, M.D.
- Chief Executive Officer
- Connections Community Support Programs, Inc.
- Wilmington, Delaware
- Norman S. Miller, M.D.
- Associate Professor of Psychiatry
- Department of Psychiatry
- University of Illinois at Chicago
- Thomas Neslund
- Executive Director
- International Commission for the Prevention of Alcoholism and Drug
Dependency
- Silver Spring, Maryland
- John Nielsen, L.P.C., C.C.D.C., M.S.S.
- Alcohol and Other Drugs Counselor
- Threshold Youth Services
- Sioux Falls, South Dakota
- Robert E. Nikkel, M.S.W.
- Coordinator
- Adult Program Services Team
- Mental Health and Development Services Division
- Office of Mental Health Services
- State of Oregon
- Fred C. Osher, M.D.
- Acting Director for Demonstration Programs
- Center for Mental Health Services
- William C. Panepinto, A.C. S.W.
- Assistant Director
- Homelessness/Housing Unit
- New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services
- T. Allan Pearson, M.S.W.
- Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drug Abuse Counselor
- Ozaukae County Department of Community Programs
- Port Washington, Wisconsin
- Walter E. Penk, Ph.D.
- Chief
- Psychology Services
- Edit Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital Bedford, Massachusetts
- Harold I. Perl, Ph.D.
- Public Health Analyst
- Homeless Demonstration and Evaluation Branch
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
- Ernest Quimby, Ph.D.
- Assistant Graduate Professor
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology
- Howard University
- Washington, D.C.
- Kathleen Reynolds, M.S.W., A.C.S.W.
- Associate Coordinator
- Livingston/Washtenaw Substance Abuse Coordinating Agency
- Washtenaw Community Mental Health
- Ypsilanti, Michigan
- Henry Jay Richards, Ph.D.
- Associate Director for Behavioral Sciences
- Patuxent Institution
- Jessup, Maryland
- Richard K. Ries, M.D.
- Director of Inpatient Psychiatry and Dual Disorder Programs
- Harborview Medical Center
- Seattle, Washington
- Bruce J. Rounsaville, M.D.
- Associate Professor of Psychiatry
- Division of Substance Abuse
- Yale School of Medicine
- New Haven, Connecticut
- Harry Schnibbe
- Executive Director
- National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors
- Bonnie Schorske, M.A.
- Coordinator
- Special Populations
- New Jersey Division of Mental Health and Hospitals
- Candace Shelton, M.S., C.A.C.
- Clinical Director
- Pascua Yaqui Adult Treatment Home
- Tucson, Arizona
- Elizabeth C. Shifflette, Ed.D.
- Staff Development and Training Coordinator
- South Carolina Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse
- Virginia Stiepock, R.N., A.C.S.W., C.S.
- Assistant Center Director/Clinical Director
- Northern Rhode Island Community Mental Health Center, Inc.
- Woonsocket, Rhode Island
- Mathias E. Stricherz, Ed.D., C.D.C. III
- Director
- Student Counseling Center
- University of South Dakota
- Vermillion, South Dakota
- J. Michael Sullivan, Ph.D.
- Clinical Director
- Evans and Sullivan
- Beaverton, Oregon
- Johnie L. Underwood, B.S., C.S.W.
- Assistant Deputy Director
- Division of Mental Health and Addictions
- Indiana Family Social Services Administration
- Mark C. Wallen, M.D.
- Medical/Clinical Director
- Livengrin Foundation, Inc.
- Bensalem, Pennsylvania
- Linda M. Washington, M.S.N., R.N., C.S.-P.
- Psychiatric Nurse Clinical Specialist
- Outpatient Addictions Services
- Montgomery County Department of Addictions, Victims, and Mental Health
Services
- Rockville, Maryland
- Patricia M. Weisser
- National Association of Psychiatric Survivors
- Sioux Falls, South Dakota
- Sonya Cornell Yarmat, M.A.
- Consultant
- Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services
- Department of Social Rehabilitation
- Topeka, Kansas
- Doug Ziedonis, M.D.
- Assistant Professor
- Department of Psychiatry
- Medical Director, Substance Abuse Treatment Unit
- Outpatient Services
- Yale University
- New Haven, Connecticut
- Joan Ellen Zweben, Ph.D.
- Executive Director
- East Bay Community Recovery Project
- 14th Street Clinic and Medical Group
- Berkeley, California
Exhibit 2-1 DSM-III-R and DSM-IV Draft Criteria
for AOD Dependence
| DSM-III-R Criterion No. |
DSM-IV Draft Criterion No. |
Diagnostic Criterion (language from DSM-III-R) |
| No. 1 |
No. 3 |
AODs are often taken in larger amounts or
over a longer period of time than the person intended. |
| No. 2 |
No. 4 |
The person has a persistent desire or has
made one or more unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control AOD use. |
| No. 3 |
No. 5 |
The person spends a great deal of time in
activities necessary to obtain, consume, or recover from AOD effect |
| No. 4 |
Deleted |
The person experiences frequent intoxication
or withdrawal symptoms when expected to fulfill major role obligations
at work, school, or home, or when AOD use is physically hazardous. |
| No. 5 |
6 |
Important social, occupational, or recreational
activities are given up or reduced because of AOD use. |
| No. 6 |
7 |
AOD use continues despite knowledge of having
a persistent or recurrent social, psychological, or physical problem
that is caused or exacerbated by AOD use. |
| No. 7 |
1 |
There is evidence of marked tolerance: a
need for markedly increased amounts of AODs to achieve intoxication
or a desired effect, or markedly diminished effect with continued
use of the same amount. |
| No. 8 |
2 |
Evidence of characteristic withdrawal symptoms. |
| No. 9 |
2 |
AODs are often taken to relieve or avoid
withdrawal symptoms. |
Exhibit 3-1 Treatment Approach Similarities and
Differences
|
Mental Health System |
Dual Disorders Approach |
Addiction System |
| Medications |
Central to the management of severe disorders
in acute, subacute, and long-term phases of treatment: antidepressants,
antipsychotics, anxiolytics, mood stabilizers. |
Central to the treatment of many patients
with dual disorders. Caution is used when prescribing psychoactive,
mood-altering medications. |
Central for acute detoxification; less common
for subacute phase. Few used during long-term treatment: disulfiram,
naltrexone, methadone, and LAAM. |
| Therapeutic Confrontations |
Minimal to moderate use, depending upon
setting, patient, and problem. Not central to therapy. |
Generally used, but use is modulated according
to fragility of mental status. |
Use by staffand peers is one of the central
techniques in AOD treatment. |
| Group Therapy |
Central to treatment. |
Central to treatment. |
Central to treatment. |
| 12-Step Groups |
Although historically underused, use is
growing. Examples include: Emotions Anonymous, Obsessive-Compulsive
Anonymous, and Phobics Anonymous. |
Dual Disorders Anonymous groups not yet
widespread. Use of 12-step groups for AOD problems is central, but
actively psychotic or paranoid patients may not mix well in meetings.
"Double Trouble" AA groups are becoming more numerous. |
Use of 12-step groups is central to AOD
treatment. Great availability. Examples include: Alcoholics Anonymous,
Narcotics Anonymous, and Cocaine Anonymous. |
| Other Self-Help Groups |
Numerous national organizations. Growing
numbers of local groups. Use depends upon availability and awareness.
Examples include: Anxiety Disorders Association of America, National
Depressive & Manic-Depressive Association, Recovery, Inc., and National
Association of Psychiatric Survivors. |
Use of self-help groups regarding AOD and
mental health problems is increasing. |
Numerous organizations and groups, often
specialized. Examples include: Women for Sobriety, Rational Recovery,
Secular Organizations for Sobriety, International Doctors in AA, Recovering
Counselors Network, and Social Workers Helping Social Workers. |
The CAGE Questionnaire:
- Have you ever felt you should cut down on your drinking?
- Have people annoyed you by criticizing your drinking?
- Have you felt bad or guilty about your drinking?
- Have you ever had a drink first thing in the morning to steady your
nervesor get rid of a hangover (eye-opener)?
Source: Mayfield et al., 1974.
The CAGE Questions Adapted to Include Drugs (CAGEAID):
- Have you felt you ought to cut down on your drinking or drug use?
- Have people annoyed you by criticizing your drinking or drug use?
- Have you felt bad or guilty about your drinking or drug use?
- Have you ever had a drink or used drugs first thing in the morning
to steady your nerves or get rid of a hangover or to get the day started?
Source: Brown, 1992.
Exhibit 5-1 Drugs That Precipitate or Mimic Mood
Disorders
| Mood Disorders |
During Use [Intoxication] |
After Use [Withdrawal] |
| Depression and dysthymia |
Alcohol, benzodiazepines, opioids, barbiturates,
cannabis, steroids (chronic), stimulants (chronic) |
Alcohol, benzodiazepines, barbiturates,
opiates, steroids (chronic), stimulants (chronic) |
| Mania and cyclothymia |
Stimulants, alcohol, hallucinogens, inhalants
(organic solvents), steroids (chronic, acute) |
Alcohol, benzodiazepines, barbiturates,
opiates, steroids (chronic) |
Exhibit 7-1 Characteristics of People With Passive-Aggressive,
Antisocial, and Borderline Personality Disorders
| Characteristic |
Passive-Aggressive |
Antisocial |
Borderline |
| Affect |
Overcontrolled hostility |
Angry intimidation |
Angry self-harm |
| World-view |
I do everything right and they still act
this way. I don't deserve this. I'm fine; ignore the tears. |
If you don't do what I want, you'll be sorry.
I deserve it all. They're the ones with the problem. |
I've got to get you, before you get me.
I don't deserve to exist. Help me, help me, but you can't. |
| Presenting problem |
Depression, somatization, sedative dependence,
codependency relationships |
Legal difficultie polysubstance abuse and
dependence, parasitic cold relationships |
Self-harm, impulsive behavior, episodic
polysubstance abuse. |
| Social functioning |
Consistent underachievement |
Episodic achievement |
Gross dysfunctioning |
| Motivation |
Belonging |
Self-esteem |
Safety |
| Defenses |
Repression |
Rationalization, projection |
Splitting, projection |
Adapted with permission from Evans, K., and Sullivan, J.M.Step Study
Counseling With the Dual Disordered Client. Center City, Minnesota: Hazelden
Educational Materials, 1990.
Exhibit 7-2 Step Work Handout For Patients With
Borderline Personality Disorder
Step One: "We admitted we were powerless over alcohol-that our lives
had become unmanageable."
- Describe five situations where you suffered negative consequences
as a result of drinking or using other drugs.
- List at least five "rules" that you have developed in order to try
to control your use of alcohol or other drugs. (Example: "I never drink
alone.")
- Give one example describing how and when you broke each rule.
- Check the following that apply to you:
- I sometimes drink or use other drugs more than I plan.
- I sometimes lie about my use of alcohol or other drugs.
- I have hidden or stashed away alcohol or other drugs so I could
use them alone or at a later time.
- I have had memory losses when drinking or using other drugs.
- I have tried to hurt myself when drinking or using other drugs.
- I can drink or use more than I used to, without feeling drunk
or high.
- My personality changes when I drink or use other drugs.
- I have school or work problems related to using alcohol or other
drugs.
- I have family problems related to my use of alcohol or other drugs.
- I have legal problems related to my use of alcohol or other drugs.
- Give two examples for each item that you checked.
Step Two: "We came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves
could restore us to sanity."
- Give three examples of how your drinking or use of other drugs was
insane. (One definition of insanity is to keep repeating the same mistake
and expecting a different outcome.)
- Check which of the following mistakes or thinking errors that you
use:
- Blaming
- Lying
- Manipulating
- Excuse making
- Beating up yourself with "I should have" statements
- Self-mutilation (cutting on yourself when angry)
- Negative self-talk
- Using angry behavior to control others
- Thinking "I'm unique."
- Explain how each thinking error you checked above is harmful to you
and others.
- Give two examples of something that has happened since you stopped
drinking or using other drugs that shows you how your situation is improving.
- Who or what is your Higher Power?
- Why do you think your Higher Power can be helpful to you?
Step Three: "Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to
the care of God as we understood Him."
- Explain how and why you decided to turn your will over to a Higher
Power.
- Give two examples of things or situations you have "turned over" in
the last week.
- List two current resentments you have, and explain why it is important
for you to turn them over to your Higher Power.
- How do you go about "turning over" a resentment?
- What does it mean to turn your will and life over to your Higher Power?
- Explain how and why you have turned your will and life over to a Power
greater than yourself.
Step Four: "Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves."
- List five things you like about yourself.
- Give five examples of situations where you have been helpful to others.
- Give three examples of sexual behaviors related to your drinking or
use of other drugs, which have occurred in the last 5 years, about which
you feel bad.
- Describe how beating yourself up for old drinking and other drug-using
behavior is not helpful to you now.
- List five current resentments you have, and explain how holding on
to these resentments hurts your recovery.
- List all laws you have broken related to your drinking and use of
other drugs.
- List three new behaviors you have learned that are helpful to your
recovery.
- List all current fears you are experiencing, and discuss how working
the first three Steps can help dissolve them.
- Give an example of a current situation you are handling poorly.
- Discuss how you plan to handle this situation differently the next
time the situation arises.
Adapted with permission from Evans, K., and Sullivan, J.M. Step Study
Counseling With the Dual Disordered Client. Center City, Minnesota: Hazelden
Educational Materials, 1990.
Exhibit 7-3 Recovery Model for the Treatment
Of Borderline Personality Disorder
| Stage |
Indications |
Goal |
Interventions |
| I. Crisis |
Behavior out of control; risk of harm to
self or others; extreme withdrawal or intrusiveness |
Safety and health through structure and
support |
- Inpatient stay
- Contracts for safety
- Case manager or support groups
- Identify triggers for relapse or stress to plan for crisis
- Make daily or weekly schedule to structure time
|
| II. Building |
Routine attendance at therapeutic sessions,
meetings, appointments; some ability to stay focused on here and now
|
Increasing coping skills and self-esteem
|
- Develop an assets or accomplishments list
- Positive self-talk and affirmations
- Skills training in time management, assertiveness, and so on
|
| III. Education |
Expresses, exhibits increased self-efficacy
|
Reframe self-perceptions and history from
victim to survivor |
- Read or debrief clinician-prescreened ACOA or incest-survivor
literature
- Classes on dysfunctional families, survivor issues
- Written assignments on strengths and limitations of "survivor
behaviors"
|
| IV. Integration |
Able to express feelings |
Integrate past, present, and regulate thinking
and actions behaviors |
- Art therapy, journal work, current feelings, thoughts, other
expressive modalities
- Psychodynamic therapy, here-and-now interpretations
- Grief and child-within work, marital, sex, or family therapy
|
Adapted with permission from Evans, K., and Sullivan, J.M.Step Study
Counseling With the Dual Disordered Client.Center City, Minnesota: Hazelden
Educational Materials, 1990.
The group facilitator will present thinking errors and then ask each
group member to identify two thinking-error examples that apply to him
or her and to choose one to focus on with group help.
- Excuse making -- Excuses can be made for anything and everything.
Excuses are a way to justify behavior. For example: "I drink because
my mother nags me," "My family was poor," "My family was rich."
- Blaming -- Blaming is an excuse to avoid solving a problem
and is used to excuse behavior and build up resentment toward someone
else for "causing" whatever has happened. For example: "They forced
me to drink it!"
- Justifying -- To justify an antisocial behavior is to find
a reason to support it. For example: "If you can, I can," "I deserve
to get high," "I've got 30 days clean."
- Redefining -- Redefining is shifting the focus on an issue
to avoid solving a problem. Redefining is used as a power play to get
the focus off the person in question. For example: "I didn't violate
my probation. The language is confusing and the order is full of typos."
- Superoptimism -- "I think; therefore it is." Example: "I don't
have to go to AA. I can stay sober on my own."
- Lying -- There are three basic kinds of lies: (1) lies of commission
-- making things up that are simply not true; (2) lies of omission --
saying partly what is so, but leaving out major sections, and (3) lies
of assent -- pretending to agree with other people or approving of their
ideas despite disagreement or having no intention of supporting the
idea.
- "I'm Unique" -- Thinking one is special and that rules shouldn't
apply to one.
- Ingratiating -- Being nice to others, and going out of one's
way to act interested in other people, can be used to try to control
situations or get the focus off a problem. Apple polishing.
- Fragmented Personality -- Some people may attend church on
Sunday, get drunk or loaded on Tuesday, and then attend church again
on Wednesday. They rarely consider the inconsistency between these behaviors.
They may feel that they have the right to do whatever they want, and
that their behaviors are justified.
- Minimizing -- Minimizing behavior and action by talking about
it in such a way that it seems insignificant. For example: "I only had
one beer. Does that count as a relapse?"
- Vagueness -- This strategy is to be unclear and nonspecific
to avoid being pinned down on any particular issue. Vague words are
phrases such as: "I more or less think so," "I guess," "probably," "maybe,"
"I might," "I'm not sure about this," "it possibly was," etc.
- Power Play -- This strategy is to use power plays whenever
one isn't getting one's way in a situation. Examples include walking
out of a room during a disagreement, threatening to call an attorney
or report the group facilitator to higher-ups.
- Victim Playing -- The victim player transacts with others to
invite either criticism or rescue from those around him.
- Grandiosity -- Grandiosity is minimizing or maximizing the
significance of an issue, and it justifies not solving the problem.
For example: "I was too scared to do anything else but sit," "I'm the
best there is, so no one else can get in my way."
- Intellectualizing -- Using an emotionally detached, data-gathering
approach to avoid responsibility. For example, when faced with a positive
urine drug screen the patient states: "When was the last time the laboratory
had their equipment calibrated?" or "What is the percentage of error
in this testing procedure?"
Adapted with permission from Evans, K., and Sullivan, J.M.Step Study
Counseling With the Dual Disordered Client.Center City, Minnesota: Hazelden
Educational Materials, 1990.
Step One: "We admitted we were powerless over alcohol -- that our
lives had become unmanageable."
- Give five examples of ways you have tried to control your use of chemicals
and failed.
- Give five examples of people you have tried and failed to control,
and explain why your controlling behavior was unsuccessful (minimum
of 150 words each).
- Give five examples of situations not associated directly with drinking
or using other drugs where you have tried to control things and failed
(minimum of 100 words each).
- Give two examples of people who currently have control over you, and
explain how that is helpful to you (minimum of 100 words each).
- Give ten examples of how your drinking and using other drugs caused
you problems (minimum of 25 words each).
- Give five examples of negative consequences that await you should
you continue using or abusing alcohol or other drugs (minimum of 50
words each).
Step Two:"Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could
restore us to sanity."
- Repeating the same mistake over and over when you continually receive
negative consequences is one definition of insanity. From the list below,
identify your "mistakes" (place a check mark on the line next to each
"mistake" that applies). Then, below the list, explain how each of these
mistakes in your thinking has caused you problems.
- Excuse making
- Minimizing
- Blaming
- Intentionally being vague
- Using anger and threats
- Superoptimism
- Using power plays
- Playing the victim
- Making fools of others
- Love for drama and excitement
- Assuming what others think and feel
- Not listening to others and being closed-minded
- Thinking "I'm unique"
- Maintaining an "image"
- Being ingratiating (kissing up)
- Being grandiose
- Lying: commission, omission, assent
- List three people with whom you are angry and explain how they can
be helpful.
- List five people more powerful than you who can help you stay clean
and sober. Explain why and how each person can help.
- Who or what is your Higher Power?
- Describe how this Higher Power can help you with your mistakes in
thinking.
Step Three: "Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over
to the care of God as we understood Him."
- How did you decide that you needed to turn your will over to a Higher
Power?
- Why is it important for you to turn your will and life over to a Higher
Power?
- Explain how you go about "turning it over."
- Give three examples of things you have had to "turn over" in the last
week.
- Give three examples of things you have yet to turn over and explain
how and when you plan to do so.
- What does it mean to "turn your will and life over to your Higher
Power"?
- Without displaying any thinking errors, explain how and why you have
turned your will and life over to a Power greater than yourself.
Step Four: "Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves."
- List any and all law violations you have committed regardless of whether
or not you were caught for these crimes.
- List every person you have a resentment against, and explain how this
resentment is hurting you.
- Give ten examples of sexual behavior you engaged in that was harmful
to your partner, and explain the negative consequences to you of this
behavior.
- Give five examples of aggressive behavior (either verbal or physical)
you have been involved in, and explain how it was hurtful to the other
person and to you.
- List five major lies you have told, and explain how that lying was
hurtful to you.
- List three lies you have told within the last 48 hours, and explain
how this lying hurts your recovery program.
Adapted with permission from Evans, K., and Sullivan, J.M.Step Study
Counseling With the Dual Disordered Client.Center City, Minnesota: Hazelden
Educational Materials, 1990.
-------------------------- End of Download Section --------------------------
Chapter 9, Appendixes, and Exhibits
|